The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exciton analysis of many-body wave functions: Bridging the gap between the quasiparticle and molecular orbital pictures
Abstract
Exciton sizes and electron-hole binding energies, which are central properties of excited states in extended systems and crucial to the design of modern electronic devices, are readily defined within a quasiparticle framework but are quite challenging to understand in the molecular-orbital picture. The intent of this work is to bridge this gap by providing a general way of extracting the exciton wave function out of a many-body wave function obtained by a quantum chemical excited-state computation. This methodology, which is based on the one-particle transition density matrix, is implemented within the ab initio algebraic diagrammatic construction scheme for the polarization propagator and specifically the evaluation of exciton sizes, i.e., dynamic charge separation distances, is considered. A number of examples are presented. For stacked dimers it is shown that the exciton size for charge separated states corresponds to the intermolecular separation, while it only depends on the monomer size for locally excited states or Frenkel excitons. In the case of conjugated organic polymers, the tool is applied to analyze exciton structure and dynamic charge separation. Furthermore, it is discussed how the methodology may be used for the construction of a charge-transfer diagnostic for time-dependent density-functional theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches
Onida, G., Reining, L., & Rubio, A. (2002) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.74.601 · Cited by 4,155
Cover Picture: Recoding the Genetic Code with Selenocysteine (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1/2014)
Bröcker, M. J., Ho, J. M. L., Church, G. M., Söll, D., & O'Donoghue, P. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201310509 · Cited by 911
Cited by
OpenMolcas: From Source Code to Insight
Fdez. Galván, I., Vacher, M., Alavi, A., Angeli, C., Aquilante, F., Autschbach, J., Bao, J. J., Bokarev, S. I., Bogdanov, N. A., Carlson, R. K., et al. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532 · Cited by 1,114
Self-citationSimulating X-ray Spectroscopies and Calculating Core-Excited States of Molecules
Norman, P., & Dreuw, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00156 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bäppler, S. A., Plasser, F., Wormit, M., & Dreuw, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2014-11-26
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2317052501
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exciton analysis of many-body wave functions: Bridging the gap between the quasiparticle and molecular orbital pictures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.90.052521
- The paper
- Bäppler, S. A., Plasser, F., Wormit, M., & Dreuw, A. (2014). Exciton analysis of many-body wave functions: Bridging the gap between the quasiparticle and molecular orbital pictures. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.90.052521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.