Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Instability of bosonic topological edge states in the presence of interactions

Lumer, Yaakov, Rechtsman, Mikael C., Plotnik, Yonatan, Segev, Mordechai·2016·Physical Review A

Abstract

Topological protection holds the promise of making quantum systems more robust against decoherence and backscattering. The interaction between particles, so far mostly neglected for bosons, is here modeled by the inclusion of nonlinear effects, such as modulational instability, to show the emergence of an unstable behavior that degrades the protection.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.94.021801

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045 · DOI · Paper page
  2. B. A. Bernevig, 2013, Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors, 10.1515/9781400846733 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.1133734 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1126/science.1148047 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.494 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235114 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nphys1926 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.081406 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nphys2063 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nmat3520 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.114301 · DOI
  13. 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000635 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nmat4573 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.aab0239 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.1507413112 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature13915 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nphys3171 · DOI
  20. Y. Castin, 2001, Coherent Atomic Matter Waves
  21. 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.243905 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.023813 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.245302 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.236 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1126/science.1202307 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.216601 · DOI
  30. 10.1126/science.1239834 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.physd.2008.12.002 · DOI
  32. 10.1364/OL.13.000794 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.3198 · DOI
  34. 10.1088/1367-2630/5/1/104 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lumer, Y., Rechtsman, M. C., Plotnik, Y., & Segev, M.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2016-08-03
Volume
94
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
Cited by
71
References
7
Language
en
Funders
  • United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (ECCS-1509546)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review