Cited by 16Quantum and electron transport phenomenaQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

Hardware-efficient error-correcting codes for large nuclear spins

Open access
Gross, Jonathan A., Godfrin, Clément, Blais, Alexandre, Dupont-Ferrier, Eva·2024·Physical Review Applied

Abstract

Universal quantum computers require a large network of qubits robust against errors. Recent theoretical and experimental studies on donor nuclear spins in silicon, engineered on semiconductor platforms compatible with industrial fabrication, show their coherent behavior and potential for scalability. Here we present a hardware-efficient quantum protocol that corrects phase flips of a nuclear spin using explicit experimentally feasible operations. We introduce moment angular system encoding that uses the large Hilbert space provided by the nuclear spin of the donor to encode the information and employ the electron spin of the donor as an ancilla for error correction. Simulations using present-day experimental manipulation fidelities predict significant improvement in logical qubit fidelity over existing spin quantum-error-correction protocols. These results provide a realizable blueprint for a corrected spin-based qubit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevapplied.22.014006

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By embedding a logical qubit within a bosonic logical qudit, multiple layers of error correction can be implemented inside a single oscillator.

    “By embedding a logical qubit within a bosonic logical qudit20,56–58, multiple layers of error correction can be implemented inside a single oscillator.”

    From Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gross, J. A., Godfrin, C., Blais, A., & Dupont-Ferrier, E.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Dupont-Ferrier, Eva
Venue
Physical Review Applied
Published
2024-07-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
014006
ISSN
2331-7019 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133457210
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Applied (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Bulletin of the American Physical Society
Funders
Canada First Research Excellence Fund and from NSERC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
quantum error correction, nuclear spin qubits, silicon donors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review