Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels
Open accessAbstract
We introduce an approach to compute the spectra of reduced density matrices for local quantum unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width. Suppose the time-evolved state under the circuit is a matrix-product state with bond dimension $D$; then the reduced density matrix of a half-infinite system has the same spectrum as an appropriate $D\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}D$ matrix acting on an ancilla space. We show that reduced density matrices at different spatial cuts are related by quantum channels acting on the ancilla space. This quantum channel approach allows for efficient numerical evaluation of the entanglement spectrum and R\'enyi entropies and their spatial fluctuations at finite times in an infinite system. We benchmark our numerical method on random unitary circuits, where many analytic results are available, and also show how our approach analytically recovers the behavior of the kicked Ising model at the self-dual point. We study various properties of the spectra of the reduced density matrices and their spatial fluctuations in both the random and translation-invariant cases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The SDKI model at h=0 is integrable and displays no decay of correlation functions.
“We use h ¼ 0.05, which is close to but not exactly at the integrable h ¼ 0 point where the SDKI model displays no decay of correlation functions.”
From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [106]
The number of Trotter steps r was chosen such that the errors on <X> due to Trotterization are below 0.01.
“The number of Trotter steps r is chosen such that the errors on hXi due to Trotterization are below 0.01, as determined by explicit calculations of the noiseless Trotterized dynamics [88] and by comparison to exact results for the continuous-time evolutions [89].”
From A Race-Track Trapped-Ion Quantum Processor (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 178
- Authors
- Gopalakrishnan, S., & Lamacraft, A.
- Affiliations
- The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2019-08-29
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 2469-9950 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9969
- OpenAlex
- W2922951482
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical review. B./Physical review. B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (NSF PHY-1748958, DMR-1653271)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P034616/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- finite water depth, entanglement spectrum, Rényi entropy, spatial fluctuations, quantum channels, matrix product states, random unitary circuits, self-dual point
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review