The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate second-order susceptibility measurements of visible and infrared nonlinear crystals
Abstract
Using the wedge technique we have directly compared the second-order nonlinear susceptibilities of infrared and visible nonlinear crystals. The measured nonlinear coefficient ratios at 2.12 \ensuremath{\mu}m relative to ${d}_{31}(\mathrm{LiI}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ are: for $\mathrm{LiNb}{\mathrm{O}}_{3}({d}_{33})$, 4.53 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 4.3; $\mathrm{GaP} ({d}_{36})$, 12.1 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1.7; $\mathrm{GaAs} ({d}_{36})$, 26.9 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 2.1; $\mathrm{AgGa}{\mathrm{Se}}_{2} ({d}_{36})$, 10.5 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1.2; $\mathrm{CdSe} ({d}_{33})$, 10.2 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1.2. The measured ratios at 1.318 \ensuremath{\mu}m relative to ${d}_{31}(\mathrm{LiI}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ are: for $\mathrm{LiI}{\mathrm{O}}_{3} ({d}_{33})$, 0.990 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 0.05; $\mathrm{LiNb}{\mathrm{O}}_{3} ({d}_{31})$, 0.870 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 0.07; $\mathrm{LiNb}{\mathrm{O}}_{3} ({d}_{33})$, 4.66 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 0.56; $\mathrm{K}{\mathrm{H}}_{2}{\mathrm{PO}}_{4} ({d}_{36})$, 0.088 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 0.01; $\mathrm{GaP} ({d}_{36})$, 12.0 \ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{} 1.2. We have used the parametric fluorescence method to accurately measure the absolute second-order susceptibility of $\mathrm{LiI}{\mathrm{O}}_{3} ({d}_{31})$ and $\mathrm{LiNb}{\mathrm{O}}_{3} ({d}_{31})$ at 4880 and 5145 \AA{}. Our recommended values for ${d}_{31}(\mathrm{LiIO}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})=(7.31\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.62)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$ and ${d}_{31}(\mathrm{LiNb}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})=(5.82\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.70)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$ m/V agree very well with previous independent absolute measurements. By scaling the nonlinear susceptibilities through the relatively dispersionless Miller's $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ and using the wedge ratio results, we have, for the first time, established a uniform scale of nonlinear susceptibility values relative to ${d}_{31}(\mathrm{LiI}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ that extends from 0.488 to 10.6 \ensuremath{\mu}m in the infrared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonlinear Dielectric Polarization in Optical Media
Kleinman, D. A. (1962) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.126.1977 · Cited by 2,469
Parametric Interaction of Focused Gaussian Light Beams
Boyd, G. D., & Kleinman, D. A. (1968) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1656831 · Cited by 1,694
Effects of Dispersion and Focusing on the Production of Optical Harmonics
Maker, P. D., Terhune, R. W., Nisenoff, M., & Savage, C. M. (1962) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.8.21 · Cited by 1,292
OPTICAL SECOND HARMONIC GENERATION IN PIEZOELECTRIC CRYSTALS
Miller, R. C. (1964) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1754022 · Cited by 976
Maker Fringes: A Detailed Comparison of Theory and Experiment for Isotropic and Uniaxial Crystals
Jerphagnon, J., & Kurtz, S. K. (1970) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1659090 · Cited by 801
LiNbO3: AN EFFICIENT PHASE MATCHABLE NONLINEAR OPTICAL MATERIAL
Boyd, G. D., Miller, R. C., Nassau, K., Bond, W. L., & Savage, A. (1964) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.1723604 · Cited by 576
Observation of Tunable Optical Parametric Fluorescence
Harris, S. E., Oshman, M. K., & Byer, R. L. (1967) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.18.732 · Cited by 311
Self-citationMixing of Visible and Near-Resonance Infrared Light in GaP
Faust, W. L., & Henry, C. H. (1966) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.1265 · Cited by 294
Power and Bandwidth of Spontaneous Parametric Emission
Byer, R. L., & Harris, S. E. (1968) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.168.1064 · Cited by 185
Self-citationRefractive indices of congruently melting lithium niobate
Nelson, D. F., & Mikulyak, R. M. (1974) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1663839 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Ultrabroadband nonlinear optics in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides
Jankowski, M., Langrock, C., Desiatov, B., Marandi, A., Wang, C., Zhang, M., Phillips, C. R., Lončar, M., & Fejer, M. M. (2020) · Optica · doi:10.1364/optica.7.000040 · Cited by 322
Heterogeneously integrated gaas waveguides on insulator for efficient frequency conversion
Chang, L., Boes, A., Guo, X., Spencer, D. T., Kennedy, M. J., Peters, J. D., Volet, N., Chiles, J., Kowligy, A., Nader, N., et al. (2018) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.201800149 · Cited by 114
Efficient second harmonic generation in nanophotonic GaAs-on-insulator waveguides
Stanton, E. J., Chiles, J., Nader, N., Moody, G., Volet, N., Chang, L., Bowers, J. E., Woo Nam, S., & Mirin, R. P. (2020) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.389423 · Cited by 82
Helmy, A. S., Abolghasem, P., Stewart Aitchison, J., Bijlani, B. J., Han, J., Holmes, B. M., Hutchings, D. C., Younis, U., & Wagner, S. J. (2011) · Laser & Photonics Reviews · doi:10.1002/lpor.201000008 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Choy, M. M., & Byer, R. L.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1976-08-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1693-1706
- ISSN
- 0556-2805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006102265
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate second-order susceptibility measurements of visible and infrared nonlinear crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.14.1693
- The paper
- Choy, M. M., & Byer, R. L. (1976). Accurate second-order susceptibility measurements of visible and infrared nonlinear crystals. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.14.1693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.