Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optical properties of ultrafine gold particles

Granqvist, C. G., Hunderi, O.·1977·Physical Review B

Abstract

We have prepared spherical and individually isolated gold particles with median diameters in the interval 3 to 4 nm and log-normal size distribution by evaporation in a few Torr of air. The volume fraction of metal was typically 0.3%. Highly reproducible optical transmittance in the range 0.3 to 4 \ensuremath{\mu}m was recorded provided the deposits (onto glass substrates) were sufficiently thin to prevent coagulation into large aggregates. A large transmittance minimum was always found at about 0.6 \ensuremath{\mu}m, whereas the samples were practically transparent at wavelengths above 1.5 \ensuremath{\mu}m. To interpret the measurements we have performed extensive computer calculations based on the effective-medium theories by Maxwell-Garnett (as extended by Polder and van Santen), Bruggeman, and by Hunderi. These theories are indistinguishable in the limit of small filling factors. As input data we have used bulk results, for which the Drude part was modified to account for a size-limited electron mean free path assuming diffuse boundary scattering. The calculated wavelength-dependent transmittances displayed a minimum whose distinctness was strongly dependent on the median particle diameter, whereas the distribution width or shape played a subordinate role. The computed results could be brought into fair agreement with the experiments provided we invoked an apparent plasma frequency for the particles which was lower than the bulk value and an effective sample thickness of the order of twice the measured one. To explain the meaning of this seemingly ad hoc procedure we have calculated (using unshifted plasma frequencies and sample thicknesses) the effects of a dielectric coating on the particles and of deviations from nonspherical shapes. Neither can be reconciled with all the experimental evidence. We finally considered the role of dipole-dipole coupling which is significant despite the small filling factors because the gas evaporated particles must be touching. This interaction is accounted for approximately by a set of effective depolarization factors pertaining to each of a number of well-defined geometrical configurations of spheres. Assuming the deposits to consist of a mixture of close-packed clusters, infinite linear chains, and independent single particles (i.e., by use of two adjustable parameters solely, whose magnitudes were supported by electron micrographs), we were able to reproduce the experimental transmittance data to within a few percent over the entire wavelength interval. The remaining deviations were presumably caused by our simplified treatment of the dipole-dipole interaction, and hence there appears to be no effects due to size quantizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.16.3513

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Granqvist, C. G., & Hunderi, O.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1977-10-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
3513-3534
ISSN
0556-2805 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570901520
Cited by
513
References
3
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.