Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cohesive properties of metallic compounds: Augmented-spherical-wave calculations

Williams, A. R., Kübler, J., Gelatt, C. D.·1979·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a conceptual model and calculational procedure for the study of the electronic structure of metallic compounds. The model consists of spherical atoms compressed into finite volumes appropriate to the solid. The model involves no adjustable or experimentally derived parameters. All contributions to the total energy (other than the Madelung energy) are obtained from independent compressed-atom calculations. Interatomic interactions enter the calculations through the electronic configuration (the distribution of the valence charge among $s$, $p$, $d$, etc., states) and boundary conditions which give the atomic valence levels a finite width. These environmental constraints, which specify the state of the compressed atoms, are obtained from energy-band calculations. For the latter we introduce a new method, which we call the augmented-spherical-wave (ASW) method to stress its conceptual similarity to Slater's augmented-plane-wave (APW) method. The ASW method is a direct descendant of the linear-muffin-tin-orbitals technique introduced by Andersen; when applied to pure metals, it yields results which closely approximate those of the much more elaborate Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker calculations of Moruzzi, Williams, and Janak. The combined ASW compressed-atom procedure is tested on (i) the empty lattice, (ii) the pure metals Na, Al, Cu, and Mo, and (iii) the ordered stoichiometric compounds NaCl, NiAl, and CuZn. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of the procedure by using it to study the anomalous tendency of Ni and Pd (as compared to their Periodic Table neighbors Co, Cu, Rh, and Ag) to form hydride phases. We have calculated the total energies of the six pure metals and their monohydrides. The total energy differences exhibit the anomaly and an analysis of quantities internal to the calculation reveals its origin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.19.6094

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,221

Metadata

Authors
Williams, A. R., Kübler, J., & Gelatt, C. D.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1979-06-15
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
6094-6118
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007804687
Cited by
1,221
References
2
FWCI
22.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohesive properties of metallic compounds: Augmented-spherical-wave calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.19.6094
The paper
Williams, A. R., Kübler, J., & Gelatt, C. D. (1979). Cohesive properties of metallic compounds: Augmented-spherical-wave calculations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.19.6094

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.