The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum photoyield of diamond(111)—A stable negative-affinity emitter
Abstract
Quantum photoyield and secondary-electron distributions are presented for an unreconstructed diamond (111) surface (type-$\mathrm{II}b$, gem-quality blue-white semiconductor). This chemically inert surface exhibits a negative electron affinity, resulting in a stable quantum yield that increases linearly from photothreshold (5.5 eV) to \ensuremath{\sim}20% at 9 eV, with a very large yield of \ensuremath{\sim}40%-70% for $13\ensuremath{\lesssim}h\ensuremath{\nu}\ensuremath{\lesssim}35$ eV. For all photon energies, secondary-electron energy distributions show a dominant \ensuremath{\sim}0.5-eV-wide emission peak at the conduction-band minimum (${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{1}^{min}=5.50\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.05$ eV above the valence-band maximum ${{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$). In contrast with recent self-consistent calculations [J. Ihm, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 17, 769 (1978)] no occupied intrinsic surface states with ionization energies in the fundamental gap (the Fermi level was 1 eV above ${{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) were observed. Likewise, the measured photothreshold (${E}_{\mathrm{vac}}\ensuremath{-}{{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{25}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$) is significantly smaller than calculated (7.0\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.7 eV).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultrawide‐Bandgap Semiconductors: Research Opportunities and Challenges
Tsao, J. Y., Chowdhury, S., Hollis, M. A., Jena, D., Johnson, N. M., Jones, K. A., Kaplar, R. J., Rajan, S., Van de Walle, C. G., Bellotti, E., et al. (2018) · Advanced Electronic Materials · doi:10.1002/aelm.201600501 · Cited by 1,602
Quasiparticle self-consistentGWmethod: A basis for the independent-particle approximation
Kotani, T., van Schilfgaarde, M., & Faleev, S. V. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.76.165106 · Cited by 469
Dynamical aspects of correlation corrections in a covalent crystal
Strinati, G., Mattausch, H. J., & Hanke, W. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.25.2867 · Cited by 305
Dimer reconstruction and electronic surface states on clean and hydrogenated diamond (100) surfaces
Furthmüller, J., Hafner, J., & Kresse, G. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.53.7334 · Cited by 279
Reversible electronic logic using switches
Merkle, R. C. (1993) · Nanotechnology · doi:10.1088/0957-4484/4/1/002 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Himpsel, F. J., Knapp, J. A., VanVechten, J. A., & Eastman, D. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1979-07-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 624-627
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050839255
- Cited by
- 1,052
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum photoyield of diamond(111)—A stable negative-affinity emitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.20.624
- The paper
- Himpsel, F. J., Knapp, J. A., VanVechten, J. A., & Eastman, D. E. (1979). Quantum photoyield of diamond(111)—A stable negative-affinity emitter. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.20.624
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.