Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,066

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case

Krishna-murthy, H., Wilkins, J., Wilson, K.·1980·Physical Review B

Abstract

The temperature-dependent impurity susceptibility for the symmetric Anderson model is calculated for all physically relevant values of its parameters $U$ (the Coulomb correlation energy) and $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ (the impurity-level width). It is shown that, when $U>\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\Gamma}$, for temperatures $T<\frac{U}{(10{k}_{B})}$ the symmetric Anderson model exhibits a local moment and that its susceptibility maps neatly onto that of the spin-\textonehalf{} Kondo model with an effective coupling given by $\ensuremath{\rho}{J}_{\mathrm{eff}}=\ensuremath{-}\frac{8\ensuremath{\Gamma}}{\ensuremath{\pi}U}$. Furthermore, this mapping is shown for remarkably large values of $|\ensuremath{\rho}{J}_{\mathrm{eff}}|$. At very low temperatures (much smaller than the Kondo temperature) the local moment is frozen out, just as for the Kondo model, leading to a strong-coupling regime of constant susceptibility at zero termperature. The results also depict the formation of a local moment from the free orbital as $T$ drops below $U$, a feature not present in the Kondo model. Finally, when $U\ensuremath{\ll}\ensuremath{\pi}\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ there is a direct transition from free-orbital regime for $T\ensuremath{\gg}\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ to the strong-coupling regime for $T\ensuremath{\ll}\ensuremath{\Gamma}$. The calculations were performed using the numerical renormalization group originally developed by Wilson for the Kondo problem. In addition to the actual numerical calculations, analytic results are presented. In particular, the effective Hamiltonians, i.e., fixed-point Hamiltonian plus relevant and marginal operators, are constructed for the free-orbital, local-moment, and strong-coupling regimes. Analytic formulas for the impurity susceptibility and free energy in all three regimes are developed. The impurity specfic heat in the strong-coupling regime is calculated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.21.1003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,066

Metadata

Authors
Krishna-murthy, H., Wilkins, J., & Wilson, K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1980-02
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
1003-1043
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060775030
Cited by
1,066
References
0
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.21.1003
The paper
Krishna-murthy, H., Wilkins, J., & Wilson, K. (1980). Renormalization-group approach to the Anderson model of dilute magnetic alloys. I. Static properties for the symmetric case. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.21.1003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.