The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Full-potential self-consistent linearized-augmented-plane-wave method for calculating the electronic structure of molecules and surfaces:O2molecule
Abstract
The linearized-augmented-plane-wave (LAPW) method for thin films is generalized by removing the remaining shape approximation to the potential inside the atomic spheres. A new technique for solving Poisson's equation for a general charge density and potential is described and implemented in the film LAPW method. In the resulting full-potential LAPW method (FLAPW), all contributions to the potential are completely taken into account in the Hamiltonian matrix elements. The accuracy of the method---already well known for clean metal surfaces---is demonstrated for the case of a nearly free (noninteracting) ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ molecule which is a severe test case of the method because of its large anisotropic charge distribution. Detailed comparisons show that the accuracy of the FLAPW results for ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ exceeds that of existing state-of-the-art local-density linear-combination-of-atomic-orbitals (LCAO)-type calculations, and that taking the full potential LAPW results as a reference, the LCAO basis can be improved by adding off-site functions. Thus the full-potential LAPW is a unified method which is ideally suited to test not only molecular adsorption on surfaces, but also the components of the same system separately, i.e., the extreme limits of the molecule and the clean surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Cited by
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Full-potential, linearized augmented plane wave programs for crystalline systems
Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Sorantin, P., & Trickey, S. B. (1990) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(90)90187-6 · Cited by 3,592
(2012) · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.033305 · Cited by 1,307
Optimization algorithm for the generation of ONCV pseudopotentials
Schlipf, M., & Gygi, F. (2015) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.05.011 · Cited by 1,300
Fluorine-doping in titanium dioxide by ion implantation technique
Yamaki, T., Umebayashi, T., Sumita, T., Yamamoto, S., Maekawa, M., Kawasuso, A., & Itoh, H. (2003) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · doi:10.1016/s0168-583x(03)00735-3 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Wimmer, E., Krakauer, H., Weinert, M., & Freeman, A. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1981-07-15
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 864-875
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055918144
- Cited by
- 2,121
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.