Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 479

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relaxational dynamics of the Edwards-Anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses

Sompolinsky, H., Zippelius, Annette·1982·Physical Review B

Abstract

Langevin equations for the relaxation of spin fluctuations in a soft-spin version of the Edwards-Anderson model are used as a starting point for the study of the dynamic and static properties of spin-glasses. An exact uniform Lagrangian for the average dynamic correlation and response functions is derived for arbitrary range of random exchange, using a functional-integral method proposed by De Dominicis. The properties of the Lagrangian are studied in the mean-field limit which is realized by considering an infinite-ranged random exchange. In this limit, the dynamics are represented by a stochastic equation of motion of a single spin with self-consistent (bare) propagator and Gaussian noise. The low-frequency and the static properties of this equation are studied both above and below ${T}_{c}$. Approaching ${T}_{c}$ from above, spin fluctuations slow down with a relaxation time proportional to ${|T\ensuremath{-}{T}_{c}|}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ whereas at ${T}_{c}$ the damping function vanishes as ${\ensuremath{\omega}}^{\frac{1}{2}}$. We derive a criterion for dynamic stability below ${T}_{c}$. It is shown that a stable solution necessarily violates the fluctuation-dissipation theorem below ${T}_{c}$. Consequently, the spin-glass order parameters are the time-persistent terms which appear in both the spin correlations and the local response. This is shown to invalidate the treatment of the spin-glass order parameters as purely static quantities. Instead, one has to specify the manner in which they relax in a finite system, along time scales which diverge in the thermodynamic limit. We show that the finite-time correlations decay algebraically with time as ${t}^{\ensuremath{-}\ensuremath{\nu}}$ at all temperatures below ${T}_{c}$, with a temperature-dependent exponent $\ensuremath{\nu}$. Near ${T}_{c}$, $\ensuremath{\nu}$ is given (in the Ising case) as $\ensuremath{\nu}(T)\ensuremath{\sim}\frac{1}{2}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\pi}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}(\frac{1\ensuremath{-}T}{{T}_{c}})+\ensuremath{\sigma}{(\frac{1\ensuremath{-}T}{{T}_{c}})}^{2}$. A tentative calculation of $\ensuremath{\nu}$ at $T=0$ K is presented. We briefly discuss the physical origin of the violation of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.25.6860

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 479

Metadata

Authors
Sompolinsky, H., & Zippelius, A.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1982-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
6860-6875
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087327526
Cited by
479
References
2
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relaxational dynamics of the Edwards-Anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.25.6860
The paper
Sompolinsky, H., & Zippelius, A. (1982). Relaxational dynamics of the Edwards-Anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.25.6860

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.