The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical interpretation of resistive transition data from arrays of superconducting weak links
Abstract
The effects of a vortex-unbinding phase transition on the properties of a square lattice of superconducting weak links are discussed. Formulas relating bulk static quantities such as the penetration depth and transition temperature to single-junction parameters are given, as well as formulas for the current- and temperature-dependent resistance. Except for temperatures very near the transition temperature, these results can differ significantly from the continuum results of Halperin and Nelson, and thus may be more appropriate for description of junction arrays and some granular films.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tunneling Between Superconductors
Ambegaokar, V., & Baratoff, A. (1963) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.10.486 · Cited by 2,195
Cited by
Granular and superconducting-glass properties of the high-temperature superconductors
Clem, J. R. (1988) · Physica C: Superconductivity · doi:10.1016/0921-4534(88)90491-1 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Lobb, C. J., Abraham, D. W., & Tinkham, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1983-01-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 150-157
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087097985
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
