The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling
Abstract
Baz' and Rybachenko have proposed the use of the Larmor precession as a clock to measure the time it takes a particle to traverse a barrier. An applied magnetic field is confined to the barrier. The spin of the incident particles is polarized perpendicular to this field. The extent of the Larmor precession occurring during transmission is used as a measurement of the time spent traversing the barrier. However, the particles tunneling through an opaque barrier also acquire a spin component parallel to the field since particles with spin parallel to the field have a higher transmission probability than particles with spin antiparallel to the field. Similar effects are actually used to polarize electrons and neutrons. An interpretation of this experiment compares the results with an approach which determines the traversal time by studying transmission of particles through a time-modulated barrier. This leads to three characteristic times describing the interaction of particles with a barrier. A dwell time measures the average time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier whether it is reflected or transmitted at the end of its stay, a traversal time measures the time interval during which a particle interacts with the barrier if it is finally transmitted, and a reflection time measures the interaction time of a reflected particle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tunneling times: a critical review
Hauge, E. H., & Støvneng, J. A. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.917 · Cited by 1,073
Electron counting statistics and coherent states of electric current
Levitov, L. S., Lee, H., & Lesovik, G. B. (1996) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.531672 · Cited by 949
Measurement of the single-photon tunneling time
Steinberg, A. M., Kwiat, P. G., & Chiao, R. Y. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.708 · Cited by 830
Barrier interaction time in tunneling
Landauer, R., & Martin, T. (1994) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.217 · Cited by 768
Eckle, P., Smolarski, M., Schlup, P., Biegert, J., Staudte, A., Schöffler, M., Muller, H. G., Dörner, R., & Keller, U. (2008) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys982 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Büttiker, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1983-05-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6178-6188
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000080206
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.27.6178
- The paper
- Büttiker, M. (1983). Larmor precession and the traversal time for tunneling. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.27.6178
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.