The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Computer study of the percolation threshold in a two-dimensional anisotropic system of conducting sticks
Abstract
We report here a Monte Carlo study of the percolation threshold in two-dimensional systems of conducting sticks. This is an extension of the work of Pike and Seager, who have considered only the isotropic sample of randomly-oriented---, equal-length---sticks system. Our study is concerned with the dependence of the percolation threshold on the macroscopic anisotropy of systems in which there is a preferred orientation of the sticks ensemble, as well as on the distribution of the sticks' lengths. In particular, we studied systems in which the orientation is determined by random alignments within a given interval or in which the alignments are normally distributed around a given direction. Similarly, for the sticks' lengths we have studied systems of equal lengths, of normally distributed lengths, and of log-normally distributed lengths. The results have shown that the percolation threshold always increases with the macroscopic anisotropy. Extrapolation of the results, from those of the finite sticks ensembles used to the infinite ensemble case, has indicated that in the infinite ensemble the percolation threshold is isotropic. It is found that the broader the stick-length distribution, the lower the mean of the distribution needed for the onset of percolation. Application of the present results for the evaluation of the conductivity indicates that the anisotropy dependence of the conductivity in systems of conducting fibers is determined by both the anisotropy dependence of the percolation threshold and the anisotropy dependence of the critical exponent. If (as found experimentally) a practically infinite two-dimensional system has a conductivity anisotropy, it must be attributed to the anisotropy in the latter parameter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanocelluloses: A New Family of Nature‐Based Materials
Klemm, D., Kramer, F., Moritz, S., Lindström, T., Ankerfors, M., Gray, D., & Dorris, A. (2011) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201001273 · Cited by 4,465
Azizi Samir, M. A. S., Alloin, F., & Dufresne, A. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm0493685 · Cited by 2,311
Sahimi, M. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.1393 · Cited by 1,082
Excluded volume and its relation to the onset of percolation
Balberg, I., Anderson, C. H., Alexander, S., & Wagner, N. (1984) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.30.3933 · Cited by 984
Self-citationConductive polymer composites with segregated structures
Pang, H., Xu, L., Yan, D.-X., & Li, Z.-M. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.07.007 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Balberg, I., & Binenbaum, N.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1983-10-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3799-3812
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977823435
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer study of the percolation threshold in a two-dimensional anisotropic system of conducting sticks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.28.3799
- The paper
- Balberg, I., & Binenbaum, N. (1983). Computer study of the percolation threshold in a two-dimensional anisotropic system of conducting sticks. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.28.3799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.