Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,226

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electron spectroscopies for Ce compounds in the impurity model

Gunnarsson, O., Schönhammer, K.·1983·Physical Review B

Abstract

We present a method for calculating the core-level x-ray photoemission (XPS), the $3d\ensuremath{\rightarrow}4f$ x-ray absorption (XAS), the valence photoemission, and the bremsstrahlung isochromat spectra in a slightly modified Anderson impurity model of a Ce compound at zero temperature. Both the spin and orbital degeneracies of the $f$ level are included and the Coulomb interaction between the $f$ electrons is taken into account. The spectra are expressed in terms of a resolvent operator. A many-electron basis set is introduced, and the resolvent is obtained from a matrix inversion. The particular form of the Anderson model allows us to find a small but sufficiently complete basis set, if the degeneracy ${N}_{f}$ of the $f$ level is large. In particular, we consider the limit ${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$, and show that the method is exact for the XPS, XAS, and valence photoemission spectra in this limit. It is also demonstrated that for ${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}6$, the method provides accurate spectra. Analytical results are obtained for the valence photoemission spectrum ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{v}(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$. The spectrum has a sharp rise close to the Fermi energy ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{F}$, which goes over to a "Kondo peak" in the spin-fluctuation limit. An exact relation between ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{v}({\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{F})$ and the $f$-level occupancy ${n}_{f}$ is shown to be satisfied to within 10% for ${N}_{f}\ensuremath{\ge}6$. We discuss how core-level XPS spectra can be used to estimate the $f$-level occupancy ${n}_{f}$ and the coupling $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ between the $f$ level and the conduction states. We find that the values of ${n}_{f}$ and $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ obtained from core-level XPS are basically consistent with the other spectroscopies and the static, $T=0$ susceptibility. It is, therefore, possible to describe these experiments in the Anderson model, using essentially the same set of parameters for all the experiments. Typically, we find ${n}_{f}>0.7$ and $\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\sim}0.1$ eV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.28.4315

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,226

Metadata

Authors
Gunnarsson, O., & Schönhammer, K.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1983-10-15
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
4315-4341
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044854403
Cited by
1,226
References
0
FWCI
29.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron spectroscopies for Ce compounds in the impurity model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.28.4315
The paper
Gunnarsson, O., & Schönhammer, K. (1983). Electron spectroscopies for Ce compounds in the impurity model. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.28.4315

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.