Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dielectric properties of heavily doped crystalline and amorphous silicon from 1.5 to 6.0 eV

Aspnes, D. E., Studna, A. A., Kinsbron, E.·1984·Physical Review B

Abstract

Extremely uniform, microscopically smooth, large-grained polycrystalline Si films saturation doped with phosphorous to a carrier concentration $n=3.3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{20}$ ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$ were prepared by a combination of low-pressure chemical-vapor-deposition and heat-treating processes to obtain samples suitable for measuring the small effects of large impurity concentrations on the above-band-gap dielectric properties of Si. From 1.5 to 2.5 eV, the effects of heavy doping are described by the Drude free-carrier model with lifetimes determined by scattering from lattice vibrations. Above 3 eV, the dielectric function spectrum of heavily doped Si is remarkably similar to that of undoped material except that the ${E}_{1}$ and ${E}_{2}$ structures are broadened and shifted to lower energies. The impurity-induced broadening is much larger for ${E}_{1}$ than for ${E}_{2}$, indicating that a metastable excitonic resonance is well developed for the former but not for the latter. Present and previous data of the authors, together with previous data of Vi\~na and Cardona, are consistent with an approximately linear shift of the threshold energy with impurity concentration. This indicates that the dominant mechanism responsible for the shifts is the effect of the random impurities on the crystal potential. While the possibility of electron-electron and electron-ion interactions on the electron and hole self-energies cannot be ruled out, comparison with recent calculations of Berggren and Sernelius show that these effects must be much smaller at higher interband transitions than at the fundamental indirect band gap. Using our data as a reference, we show that the anomalous absorption observed by Jellison and co-workers for As-implanted and laser-annealed $c\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{i}$ is due to microscopically rough surface layers on their samples. Consequently, the differences that they observe between P and As dopants must involve differences in recrystallization and regrowth. Dielectric-function spectra for amorphous Si films doped in situ with phosphorus are essentially identical within microstructural effects to those of undoped material, indicating no significant influence from heavy doping. At energies below 3.2 eV, the data expressed as ${(\ensuremath{\alpha}nE)}^{\frac{1}{3}}$ or as ${({\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{2})}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ both vary nearly linearly with energy, suggesting nondirect transitions between simple parabolic bands with momentum matrix elements linearly proportional to $E$ or with dipole elements independent of $E$.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.29.768

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Aspnes, D. E., Studna, A. A., & Kinsbron, E.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1984-01-15
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
768-779
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984020462
Cited by
329
References
1
FWCI
27.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.