Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 439

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Small normal-metal loop coupled to an electron reservoir

Büttiker, M.·1985·Physical Review B

Abstract

A conceptually simple approach is proposed to introduce dissipation into a normal-metal loop penetrated by a flux. The loop is coupled via a single current lead to an electron reservoir. Scattering processes in the loop are elastic. Inelastic processes occur only in the reservoir and are the source of dissipation. We investigate the effect of this reservoir on the persistent currents in the loop and the adsorption of power in the presence of a sinusoidally modulated flux.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.32.1846

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 439

Metadata

Authors
Büttiker, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1985-08-01
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
1846-1849
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042321952
Cited by
439
References
0
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small normal-metal loop coupled to an electron reservoir. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.32.1846
The paper
Büttiker, M. (1985). Small normal-metal loop coupled to an electron reservoir. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.32.1846

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.