Cited by 396Theoretical and Computational PhysicsQuantum and electron transport phenomenaTopological Materials and Phenomena

Critical behavior of disordered degenerate semiconductors. II. Spectrum and transport properties in mean-field theory.

Fradkin, Eduardo·1986·Physical Review B

Abstract

The critical behavior of disordered degenerate semiconductors is studied within a mean-field theory valid when the number of degeneracy points is large. I show that above two dimensions there is a semimetal-metal transition at a critical impurity concentration. The mean free path and the one-particle density of states exhibit scaling behavior with universal exponents. The transition is smeared at nonzero temperature. An equation of state, relating temperature, disorder, and bare conductivity, is presented. In two dimensions, the semimetallic phase is unstable. I show that a localization transition follows except in two dimensions where all states are localized. The bare conductivity appears to be a universal number in two dimensions. Applications to zero-gap semiconductors and other systems are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.33.3263

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is broad theoretical consensus that a 2D gas of Dirac fermions should exhibit a minimum conductivity of about e^2/h.

    “Although there is a broad theoretical consensus [18-23,10,11] that a 2D gas of Dirac fermions should exhibit a minimum conductivity of about e 2 / h”

    From Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene (2005) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Analogous calculations for 3D semimetals show a vanishing density of states persisting up to a finite value of disorder strength (Fradkin, 1986; Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011; Hosur et al., 2012; Pixley et al., 2016a) beyond which a metallic state is expected.

    “Analogous calculations for 3D semimetals show a vanishing density of states persisting up to a finite value of disorder strength (Fradkin, 1986; Goswami and Chakravarty, 2011; Hosur et al. , 2012; Pixley et al. , 2016a) beyond which a metallic state is expected.”

    From Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids (2018) · cites this paper as Fradkin, 1986

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 396

Authors
Fradkin, E.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Fradkin, Eduardo
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1986-03-01
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
3263-3268
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018317672
Cited by
396
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical review. B, Condensed matter (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Topological Materials and Phenomena
Keywords
critical behavior, mean-field theory, critical impurity concentration, mean free path, density of states, scaling exponents, equation of state, localization transition, two-dimensional localization, zero-gap semiconductors, Anderson localization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review