The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental tests for the quantum behavior of a macroscopic degree of freedom: The phase difference across a Josephson junction
Abstract
Experiments are described that demonstrate the quantum behavior of a macroscopic degree of freedom, namely the phase difference \ensuremath{\delta} across a current-biased Josephson tunnel junction. The behavior of \ensuremath{\delta} was deduced from measurements of the escape rate \ensuremath{\Gamma} of the junction from its zero-voltage state. The relevant parameters of the junction, that is, its critical current and shunting admittance, were determined in situ in the thermal regime from the dependence of \ensuremath{\Gamma} on bias current and from resonant activation in the presence of microwaves. It was found that the shunting capacitance was dominated by the self-capacitance of the junction while the shunting conductance was dominated by the bias circuitry. For an underdamped junction in the quantum regime, \ensuremath{\Gamma} became independent of temperature at low temperatures with a value that, with no adjustable parameters, was in excellent agreement with predictions for macroscopic quantum tunneling at T=0. When the critical current was reduced with a magnetic field so that the junction remained in the thermal regime at low temperatures, \ensuremath{\Gamma} followed the predictions of the thermal model, thereby showing the influence of extraneous noise to be negligible. In a further series of experiments, the existence of quantized energy levels in the potential well of the junction was demonstrated spectroscopically. The positions of the energy levels agreed quantitatively with quantum-mechanical predictions involving junction parameters measured in the thermal regime. The relative heights and widths of the resonances are in reasonable agreement with the predictions of a simple model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Macroscopic Quantum Systems and the Quantum Theory of Measurement
Leggett, A. J. (1980) · Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement · doi:10.1143/ptps.69.80 · Cited by 674
Devoret, M. H., Martinis, J. M., & Clarke, J. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1908 · Cited by 454
Self-citation
Cited by
Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers
Hänggi, P., Talkner, P., & Borkovec, M. (1990) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.251 · Cited by 6,154
Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics
Omnès, R. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.339 · Cited by 648
Reduction of a wave packet in quantum Brownian motion
Unruh, W. G., & Zurek, W. H. (1989) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.40.1071 · Cited by 599
Decoherence of a superconducting qubit due to bias noise
Martinis, J. M., Nam, S., Aumentado, J., Lang, K. M., & Urbina, C. (2003) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.67.094510 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H., & Clarke, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1987-04-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4682-4698
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079180900
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.