The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elastic fracture in random materials
Abstract
We analyze a simple model of elastic failure in randomly inhomogeneous materials such as minerals and ceramics. We study a two-dimensional triangular lattice with nearest-neighbor harmonic springs. The springs are present with probability p. The springs can only withstand a small strain before they fail completely and irreversibly. The applied breakdown stress in a large, but finite, sample tends to zero as the fraction of springs in the material approaches the rigidity percolation threshold. The average initial breakdown stress, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{b}$, behaves as ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}_{\mathrm{b}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}$\ensuremath{\approxeq}[A(p)+B(p)ln(L)${]}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}1}$, where L is the linear dimension of the system and the exponent \ensuremath{\mu} is between 1 and 2. The coefficient B(p) diverges as p approaches the rigidity percolation threshold. The breakdown-stress distribution function ${F}_{L}$(\ensuremath{\sigma}) has the form ${\mathit{F}}_{\mathit{L}}$(\ensuremath{\sigma})\ensuremath{\approxeq}1-exp[-${\mathit{cL}}^{2}$exp(-k/${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\sigma}}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\mu}}}$)]. The parameters c and k are constants characteristic of the microscopic properties of the system. The parameter k tends to zero at the rigidity percolation threshold. These predictions are verified by computer simulations of random lattices. The breakdown process can continue until a macroscopic elastic failure occurs in the system. The failure occurs in two steps. First, a number of springs fail at approximately the strain which causes the initial failure. This results in a system which has zero elastic modulus. Finally, at a considerably larger strain a macroscopic crack forms across the entire sample.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
Griffith, A. A. (1921) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 · Cited by 11,052
Cited by
Ductile-brittle transition in random porous Au
Li, R., & Sieradzki, K. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.68.1168 · Cited by 393
A 3D distinct lattice spring model for elasticity and dynamic failure
Zhao, G., Fang, J., & Zhao, J. (2011) · International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · doi:10.1002/nag.930 · Cited by 321
Structure and functionality of edible fats
Marangoni, A. G., Acevedo, N., Maleky, F., Co, E., Peyronel, F., Mazzanti, G., Quinn, B., & Pink, D. (2012) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/c1sm06234d · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Beale, P. D., & Srolovitz, D. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1988-04-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5500-5507
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017808203
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastic fracture in random materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.37.5500
- The paper
- Beale, P. D., & Srolovitz, D. J. (1988). Elastic fracture in random materials. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.37.5500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.