Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 296

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Origins of the universal binding-energy relation

Banerjea, Amitava, Smith, John R.·1988·Physical Review B

Abstract

The universality of the relation between binding energy and interatomic separation occurs for metallic and covalent bonds in a wide range of situations, spanning diatomic-molecule energetics, chemisorption, bimetallic adhesion, cohesion in solids, and even interactions in nuclear matter. This has intrigued physicists for some time, and here we provide some insights into its origin. We considered the electron density distribution as the variable linking the total energy and interparticle separation. In the spirit of effective-medium theory, a host electron density as seen by each atom was computed. We found that in every case (cohesion, chemisorption, and diatomic molecules), the host electron density was, to a good approximation, a simple exponential function of interparticle separation. This arises primarily because of the essentially exponential decay of the electron density into vacancy sites, into interstitial regions, into the vacuum from surfaces, or into the vacuum from isolated atoms. This suggested a scaling of the electron density which provides a universal relationship between the scaled interatomic separation and the scaled electron density.This density scaling is key. We applied the scaling of the electron density to impurity-binding-energy--host-electron-density curves computed via the effective-medium approximation. A universal energy--electron-density relationship resulted. This could be combined with the previously noted universal relation between scaled electron density and interparticle separation to yield the universal binding-energy--distance relation. First-principles values of cohesive energies of solids and the energetics of certain diatomic molecules were also correlated with host electron densities, despite the fact that these types of energies are fundamentally different from each other and from impurity binding energies. We found a universal relationship between energies and host electron densities for cohesion and certain diatomic molecules which was the same as the one discovered for impurity binding energies. This, together with the universal relationship between electron density and interatomic separation, helps one to understand how a single energy-distance relation could describe chemisorption and cohesion as well as diatomic energetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.37.6632

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 296

Metadata

Authors
Banerjea, A., & Smith, J. R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1988-04-15
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
6632-6645
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012944026
Cited by
296
References
8
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origins of the universal binding-energy relation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.37.6632
The paper
Banerjea, A., & Smith, J. R. (1988). Origins of the universal binding-energy relation. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.37.6632

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.