Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,388

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures

Chakravarty, Sudip, Halperin, Bertrand I., Nelson, David R.·1989·Physical Review B

Abstract

It is argued that the long-wavelength, low-temperature behavior of a two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet can be described by a quantum nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ model in two space plus one time dimension, at least in the range of parameters where the model has long-range order at zero temperature. The properties of the quantum nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ model are analyzed approximately using the one-loop renormalization-group method. When the model has long-range order at $T=0$, the long-wavelength behavior at finite temperatures can be described by a purely classical model, with parameters renormalized by the quantum fluctuations. The low-temperature behavior of the correlation length and the static and dynamic staggered-spin-correlation functions for the quantum antiferromagnet can be predicted, in principle, with no adjustable parameters, from the results of simulations of the classical model on a lattice, combined with a two-loop renormalization-group analysis of the classical nonlinear $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ model, a calculation of the zero-temperature spin-wave stiffness constant and uniform susceptibility of the quantum antiferromagnet, and a one-loop analysis of the conversion from a lattice cutoff to the wave-vector cutoff introduced by quantum mechanics when the spin-wave frequency exceeds $\frac{T}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}$. Applying this approach to the spin-\textonehalf{} Heisenberg model on a square lattice, with nearest-neighbor interactions only, we obtain a result for the correlation length which is in good agreement with the data of Endoh et al. on ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}$Cu${\mathrm{O}}_{4}$, if the spin-wave velocity is assumed to be 0.67 eV $\frac{\AA{}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}}$. We also argue that the data on ${\mathrm{La}}_{2}$Cu${\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ cannot be easily explained by any model in which an isolated Cu${\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ layer would not have long-range antiferromagnetic order at $T=0$. Our theory also predicts a quasielastic peak of a few meV width at 300 K when $k\ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\ll}1$ (where $k$ is wave-vector transfer and $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is the correlation length). The extent to which this dynamical prediction agrees with experiments remains to be seen. In an appendix, we discuss the effect of introducing a frustrating second-nearest-neighbor coupling for the antiferromagnet on the square lattice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.39.2344

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,388

Metadata

Authors
Chakravarty, S., Halperin, B. I., & Nelson, D. R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1989-02-01
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
2344-2371
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W291443582
Cited by
1,388
References
0
FWCI
27.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.39.2344
The paper
Chakravarty, S., Halperin, B. I., & Nelson, D. R. (1989). Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.39.2344

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.