Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Onset of superconductivity in ultrathin granular metal films

Jaeger, H. M., Haviland, D. B., Orr, B. G., Goldman, A. M.·1989·Physical Review B

Abstract

The evolution of superconductivity in ultrathin films of Sn, Pb, Ga, Al, and In has been examined as a function of thickness and temperature. The films were grown in increments by condensation from the vapor onto substrates held at temperatures below 18 K. For each metal, global superconductivity or zero electrical resistance was found when the normal-state sheet resistance ${R}_{N}$ fell below a value close to h/4${e}^{2}$, or 6.45 k\ensuremath{\Omega}/\ensuremath{\square}, an observation uncorrelated with either structural or material parameters such as thickness or transition temperature. Prior evidence of superconductivity with nonzero resistance, local superconductivity, was found at earlier stages of film growth. All evidences of superconducting behavior were observed at temperatures close to the bulk transition temperature beginning in the range of thicknesses for which normal-state resistivities were greater than 200 \ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\Omega}-cm and were rapidly changing with thickness. This implies that the films consisted of fully superconducting grains connected by tunneling junctions. The strong disorder represented by a broad distribution of junction parameters can be renormalized into weak disorder. Thus theoretical calculations based on regular arrays of superconducting sites coupled by (Josephson) junctions appear to be relevant. The extreme thinness of the films implies very small junction capacitances leading to large quantum fluctuations of the phase differences of their superconducting order parameters. Two classes of theories explaining a nearly universal resistance threshold for superconductivity have emerged. Both classes involve the quenching of these quantum fluctuations. In the limit of very small junction capacitances the threshold occurs at resistance values near h/4${e}^{2}$, and is essentially independent of the capacitance and the energy gap, in good agreement with the experimental data. Not contained in any of the models is an explanation of the observed regular variation of the low-temperature resistances of the films with the normal-state sheet resistance for values just above the resistance threshold.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.40.182

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 407

Metadata

Authors
Jaeger, H. M., Haviland, D. B., Orr, B. G., & Goldman, A. M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1989-07-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
182-196
ISSN
0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996372973
Cited by
407
References
2
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.