Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 413

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantum size effects on the exciton energy of CdS clusters

Wang, Ying, Herron, Norman·1990·Physical Review B

Abstract

We report an experimental investigation of the dependence of the lowest exciton energy of CdS clusters (quantum dots) on the cluster size. The cluster diameter is varied from 60 to 10 \AA{}. X-ray diffraction provides definitive identification of the cluster phase and permits a determination of the average cluster size. We find that the observed size dependence cannot be explained by models based on the effective-mass approximation, but, for clusters larger than 20 \AA{} in diameter, it is in agreement with a recent tight-binding calculation [P. E. Lippens and M. Lannoo, Phys. Rev. B 39, 10 935 (1989)]. Below 20 \AA{}, where the cluster deviates from the bulk zinc-blende structure, some discrepancy between the tight-binding calculation and experiments becomes evident.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.42.7253

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., & Herron, N.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1990-10-15
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
7253-7255
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2057894860
Cited by
413
References
0
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.