The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic pair-breaking effects: Moment formation and critical doping level in superconductingLa1.85Sr0.15Cu1−xAxO4systems (A=Fe,Co,Ni,Zn,Ga,Al)
Abstract
We have conducted a systematic study on the effect of Cu-site doping in ${\mathrm{La}}_{1.85}$${\mathrm{Sr}}_{0.15}$${\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ system. The relations between ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}}$ and doping level as well as the critical doping levels ${\mathit{x}}_{\mathit{c}}$ have been determined accurately for the Fe-, Co-, Ni-, Zn-, Ga-, and Al-doped systems. Every dopant either carries an intrinsic magnetic moment or induces a net moment on the Cu-${\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ plane. The size of the moment is correlated with the suppression of superconductivity, consistent with the magnetic-pair-breaking effect. The ground states of the dopants have also been determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
d-wave superconductor as a model of high-Tcsuperconductors
Won, H., & Maki, K. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.1397 · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiao, G., Cieplak, M. Z., Xiao, J. Q., & Chien, C. L.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 8752-8755
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2070380938
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
