Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 809

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides

Büttiker, M.·1992·Physical Review B

Abstract

The low-frequency current-fluctuation spectra of phase-coherent electron conductors are related to the scattering matrix of the conductor. Each contact of the conductor is connected to a thermal equilibrium electron reservoir. The current-current correlations of the conductor are compared with the intensity-intensity correlations of a photon wave guide with all its ports connected to blackbody radiation sources. Only two sources of noise are considered: (a) Fluctuations in the occupation numbers of the incident channels that reflect the thermal equilibrium fluctuations of the reservoir states and (b) a shot noise (or partition noise) that originates if a carrier can be scattered into more than one final state and is present even at zero temperature. The theory uses single-particle scattering states to build up multiparticle states with the proper symmetry. Second quantization provides an elegant treatment of this problem if annihilation and creation operators for both the input and output channels of the wave guide are introduced. At equilibrium, in the absence of transport, the correlations of flux fluctuations measured at two different contacts are negative for both fermions and bosons. Away from equilibrium, in the presence of a net flux, the fluctuations are related to transport coefficients which invoke products of four scattering matrices.The transport portion of the correlation of the flux fluctuations at two different contacts is negative for fermions but is positive for bosons. The transport portion (shot noise) is very sensitive to the transmission behavior of the wave guide. Both for fermions and for bosons completely open transmission channels give no contribution. In addition to two-terminal conductors, we consider four-probe conductors in high magnetic fields which have the property that carriers transmitted and reflected at a barrier reach separate contacts. We discuss a four-terminal experiment which explicitly shows that the correlation function in the presence of two particle sources is not an incoherent sum of correlations generated by particles originating in one of the sources but contains exchange terms due to the indistinguishability of identical particles. We discuss the conditions for such exchange terms to be sensitive to a quantum-mechanical phase and the possibility to tune this phase with the help of an Aharonov-Bohm flux.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.46.12485

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 809

Metadata

Authors
Büttiker, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1992-11-15
Volume
46
Issue
19
Pages
12485-12507
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2091417292
Cited by
809
References
1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.46.12485
The paper
Büttiker, M. (1992). Scattering theory of current and intensity noise correlations in conductors and wave guides. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.46.12485

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.