Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Suppression of shot noise in metallic diffusive conductors

Open access
Beenakker, C. W. J., Büttiker, M.·1992·Physical Review B
DOI 10.1103/physrevb.46.1889
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The shot-noise power in a disordered phase-coherent conductor, much longer than the mean free path but much shorter than an inelastic scattering length, is one-third of the classical value of a Poisson process. The reduction below the classical value is a consequence of noiseless open quantum channels. In conductors much longer than an inelasic length, shot noise is further suppressed due to counterbalancing voltage fluctuations which enforce charge neutrality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.46.1889

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Beenakker, C. W. J., & Büttiker, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
1992-07-15
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1889-1892
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
DOI
10.1103/physrevb.46.1889
OpenAlex
W1986202503
Cited by
450
References
0
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suppression of shot noise in metallic diffusive conductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.46.1889
The paper
Beenakker, C. W. J., & Büttiker, M. (1992). Suppression of shot noise in metallic diffusive conductors. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.46.1889

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.