Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insulator, metal, or superconductor: The criteria

Scalapino, Douglas J., White, Steven R., Zhang, Shoucheng·1993·Physical Review B

Abstract

The appropriate infinite-wavelength ${\mathit{q}}_{\mathit{i}}$\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 and zero-frequency \ensuremath{\omega}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 limits of the paramagnetic current-current correlation function provide criteria for determining whether a system is insulating, metallic, or superconducting. Here we discuss these criteria for lattice models and present Monte Carlo data for the two-dimensional positive- and negative-U Hubbard models that imply that the ground state of the half-filled positive-U Hubbard model is an insulator, the doped state is a metal, and the negative-U Hubbard model is a superconductor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.47.7995

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Scalapino, D. J., White, S. R., & Zhang, S.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1993-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
13
Pages
7995-8007
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2029536527
Cited by
481
References
21
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.