Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 372

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quasiparticle band-structure calculations for C, Si, Ge, GaAs, and SiC using Gaussian-orbital basis sets

Rohlfing, Michael, Krüger, Peter, Pollmann, Johannes·1993·Physical Review B

Abstract

We report state-of-the-art first-principles calculations of the quasiparticle energies of prototype homopolar and heteropolar covalent semiconductors described in terms of the electron self-energy operator. The wave functions are calculated within density-functional theory using the local-density approximation and employing nonlocal, norm-conserving pseudopotentials. The self-energy operator is evaluated in the GW approximation. Employing the plasmon-pole approximation for the frequency dependence of the dielectric matrix ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathbf{G},\mathbf{G}\ensuremath{'}}$(q,\ensuremath{\omega}), its static part is fully calculated within the random-phase approximation (RPA) as well as by using a number of different models. All calculations are carried out employing localized Gaussian orbital basis sets. This will turn out to be very useful for detailed studies of the quasiparticle properties of more complex systems such as bulk defects including lattice relaxation and reconstructed surfaces with large unit cells or interfaces, which are otherwise computationally too demanding. Using an s,p,d,s* basis set of 40 Gaussian orbitals for Si, for example, yields already convergent results in excellent agreement with the results of a 350-plane-wave calculation in the corresponding plane-wave representation. Most of our results for Si, diamond, Ge, and GaAs are in very good agreement with experimental data and with available plane-wave GW calculations. To our knowledge, our results for SiC are the first quasiparticle energies reported so far for this important material of high current technological interest. Also in this case we find very good agreement with the available experimental data except for E(${\mathrm{L}}_{1\mathrm{c}}$). We believe that this deviation may be attributed to experimental uncertainties. In particular, we discuss and scrutinize the applicability of six different models for the static dielectric matrix ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}}_{\mathbf{G},\mathbf{G}\ensuremath{'}}$(q,0) in the GW approximation ranging from the simple Hartree-Fock expression over diagonal models to nondiagonal models that take the local fields within the inhomogeneous electronic charge density into account. Some of the nondiagonal models are shown to yield results in very good agreement with the full RPA results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.48.17791

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 372

Metadata

Authors
Rohlfing, M., Krüger, P., & Pollmann, J.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1993-12-15
Volume
48
Issue
24
Pages
17791-17805
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2013227032
Cited by
372
References
2
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quasiparticle band-structure calculations for C, Si, Ge, GaAs, and SiC using Gaussian-orbital basis sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.48.17791
The paper
Rohlfing, M., Krüger, P., & Pollmann, J. (1993). Quasiparticle band-structure calculations for C, Si, Ge, GaAs, and SiC using Gaussian-orbital basis sets. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.48.17791

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.