The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical renormalization-group study of low-lying eigenstates of the antiferromagnetic S=1 Heisenberg chain
Abstract
We present results of a numerical renormalization-group study of the isotropic S=1 Heisenberg chain. The density-matrix renormalization-group techniques used allow us to calculate a variety of properties of the chain with unprecedented accuracy. The ground-state energy per site of the infinite chain is found to be ${\mathit{e}}_{0}$\ensuremath{\simeq}-1.401 484 038 971(4). Open-ended S=1 chains have effective S=1/2 spins on each end, with exponential decay of the local spin moment away from the ends, with decay length \ensuremath{\xi}\ensuremath{\simeq}6.03(1). The spin-spin correlation function also decays exponentially, and although the correlation length cannot be measured as accurately as the open-end decay length, it appears that the two lengths are identical. The string correlation function shows long-range order, with g(\ensuremath{\infty})\ensuremath{\simeq}-0.374 325 096(2). The excitation energy of the first excited state, a state with one magnon with momentum q=\ensuremath{\pi}, is the Haldane gap, which we find to be \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.410 50(2). We find many low-lying excited states, including one- and two-magnon states, for several different chain lengths. The magnons have spin S=1, so the two-magnon states are singlets (S=0), triplets (S=1), and quintuplets (S=2). For magnons with momenta near \ensuremath{\pi}, the magnon-magnon interaction in the triplet channel is shown to be attractive, while in the singlet and quintuplet channels it is repulsive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Self-citation
Cited by
The density-matrix renormalization group
Schollwöck, U. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.259 · Cited by 3,323
Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.10345 · Cited by 3,244
Self-citationThermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization.
Östlund, S., & Rommer, S. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.3537 · Cited by 1,077
Studying Two-Dimensional Systems with the Density Matrix Renormalization Group
Stoudenmire, E. M., & White, S. R. (2012) · Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics · doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125018 · Cited by 451
Self-citationVariational optimization algorithms for uniform matrix product states
Zauner-Stauber, V., Vanderstraeten, L., Fishman, M. T., Verstraete, F., & Haegeman, J. (2018) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.045145 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- White, S. R., & Huse, D. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3844-3852
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2034042302
- Cited by
- 606
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical renormalization-group study of low-lying eigenstates of the antiferromagnetic S=1 Heisenberg chain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.48.3844
- The paper
- White, S. R., & Huse, D. A. (1993). Numerical renormalization-group study of low-lying eigenstates of the antiferromagnetic S=1 Heisenberg chain. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.48.3844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.