Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of the influence of Ni and Zn impurities on the electromagnetic properties ofYBa2Cu3O6.95

Bonn, D. A., Kamal, S., Zhang, Kuan, Liang, Ruixing, Baar, D. J., Klein, E., Hardy, W. N.·1994·Physical Review B

Abstract

A set of highly sensitive cavity perturbation techniques, quite different from the ones most commonly used to measure thin films, has been developed for measuring the surface impedance of small crystals of high-${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}}$ superconductors. Since the results of these studies differ markedly from most surface-impedance measurements of thin films of high-${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}}$ superconductors, we describe the techniques in detail, including recent improvements. Measurements of the surface resistance and penetration depth of a twin-free crystal of ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}$${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$${\mathrm{O}}_{6.95}$ indicate two striking differences from the surface impedance of conventional superconductors. Both quantities exhibit linear temperature dependence at low temperatures rather than the exponentially activated behavior of an s-wave BCS superconductor. Also, a broad peak in the temperature dependence of the surface resistance indicates that the large transport scattering rate in the normal state collapses below ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathit{c}}$ as the holes condense into the superconducting condensate. Systematic studies of the influence of Zn and Ni impurities on the surface impedance indicate that these properties are very sensitive to defects and this sensitivity provides further insight into the pairing state. Although both types of impurities provide strong elastic scattering that limits the collapse of the scattering rate and suppresses the peak in the surface resistance, only Zn has a strong pair-breaking effect. As little as 0.31% Zn substitution makes ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}$${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$${\mathrm{O}}_{6.95}$ gapless, but Ni, which is a magnetic impurity has no such pair-breaking effect up to 0.75% substitution. This difference is the opposite of that expected for an s-wave BCS superconductor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.50.4051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 333

Metadata

Authors
Bonn, D. A., Kamal, S., Zhang, K., Liang, R., Baar, D. J., Klein, E., & Hardy, W. N.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
4051-4063
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2010122744
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
19.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the influence of Ni and Zn impurities on the electromagnetic properties ofYBa2Cu3O6.95. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.50.4051
The paper
Bonn, D. A., Kamal, S., Zhang, K., Liang, R., Baar, D. J., Klein, E., & Hardy, W. N. (1994). Comparison of the influence of Ni and Zn impurities on the electromagnetic properties ofYBa2Cu3O6.95. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.50.4051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.