Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of stoichiometry on the structure ofTiO2(110)

Murray, P. W., Condon, N. G., Thornton, G.·1995·Physical Review B

Abstract

Scanning tunneling microscopy has been used to investigate the structure of ${\mathrm{TiO}}_{2}$(110) as a function of oxygen-vacancy density. The results are consistent with imaging Ti atoms, as expected given the positive sample bias employed. Our results for the stoichiometric 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 surface are in line with the structure expected on the basis of bulk termination. On the surfaces prepared here, a small density of the reduced 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 phase always accompanied the 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 termination, nucleating at step edges. With increasing O-vacancy density, the 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 phase increased in area, eventually dominating the surface. Atomically resolved images indicate a structure that involves the loss of every other bridging O row, a 0.5-\AA{} lateral displacement of fivefold-coordinated Ti atoms along [11\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}0], and a relaxation of ${\mathrm{Ti}}^{3+}$ ions towards the bulk. Coexisting with the 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 phase is a structure with 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 local symmetry that is periodic along [11\ifmmode\bar\else\textasciimacron\fi{}0]. This appears to arise from a transfer of O from the remaining bridging O rows to reoccupy O-vacancy sites and to sit atop fivefold-coordinated Ti atoms. Accompanying this rearrangement of O atoms, fivefold Ti atoms relax back to their positions in the 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1 phase, suggesting that the 2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 phase acts to relieve the strain imposed by formation of the 1\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}2 morphology. Further reduction of the substrate results in faceting to (100), (011), and (111) planes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.51.10989

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Murray, P. W., Condon, N. G., & Thornton, G.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1995-04-15
Volume
51
Issue
16
Pages
10989-10997
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2033376767
Cited by
181
References
1
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of stoichiometry on the structure ofTiO2(110). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.51.10989
The paper
Murray, P. W., Condon, N. G., & Thornton, G. (1995). Effect of stoichiometry on the structure ofTiO2(110). Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.51.10989

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.