The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient scheme for GW quasiparticle band-structure calculations with applications to bulk Si and to the Si(001)-(2×1) surface
Abstract
We report an efficient scheme for evaluating the quasiparticle corrections to local-density-approximation (LDA) band structures within the GW approximation. In this scheme, the GW self-energy corrections are evaluated in a sufficiently flexible Gaussian orbital basis set instead of using plane-wave Fourier representations of the relevant two-point functions. It turns out that this set has to include orbitals up to f-type symmetry, when in the LDA calculations Gaussian orbitals up to d-type symmetry are needed for convergence. For bulk Si, both schemes yield virtually identical quasiparticle band structures and the demand on computer time is roughly the same. For the Si(001)-(2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1) surface, the GW Gaussian orbital scheme is a factor of 5 faster. In our calculations for Si(001)-(2\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}1) the dynamic dielectric matrix is obtained by applying a plasmon-pole approximation. The static dielectric matrix of the Si(001) surface is fully calculated within the random phase approximation (RPA). In addition, we have performed quasiparticle surface band-structure calculations employing two model dielectric matrices. Our respective results are compared with those obtained employing the full RPA dielectric matrix as well as with results of previous calculations by other authors which were based on model dielectric matrices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Analysis of separable potentials
Gonze, X., Stumpf, R., & Scheffler, M. (1991) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.8503 · Cited by 605
Cited by
Implementation and performance of the frequency-dependentGWmethod within the PAW framework
Shishkin, M., & Kresse, G. (2006) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.035101 · Cited by 960
Blase, X., Attaccalite, C., & Olevano, V. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.115103 · Cited by 448
Excitonic Effects and the Optical Absorption Spectrum of Hydrogenated Si Clusters
Rohlfing, M., & Louie, S. G. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.3320 · Cited by 362
Self-citationCombining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohlfing, M., Krüger, P., & Pollmann, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-07-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1905-1917
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2062227389
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient scheme for GW quasiparticle band-structure calculations with applications to bulk Si and to the Si(001)-(2×1) surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.52.1905
- The paper
- Rohlfing, M., Krüger, P., & Pollmann, J. (1995). Efficient scheme for GW quasiparticle band-structure calculations with applications to bulk Si and to the Si(001)-(2×1) surface. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.52.1905
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.