Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tight-binding study of interaction time in molecular switches

English, R. A., Mišković, Z. L., Davison, S. G., Goodman, F. O.·1996·Physical Review B

Abstract

A characteristic switching time, associated with an impurity embedded in a tight-binding polyene chain, is developed. The modulated-energy traversal time, derived for potential models, is modified to the tight-binding situation. Since the traversal time takes into account the physical distance propagated, which is a meaningless concept in the context of the tight-binding model, we obtain an interaction time that measures the delay in tunnelling through the impurity site. The switching time is discussed in terms of the impurity-parameter space. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.54.10

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
English, R. A., Mišković, Z. L., Davison, S. G., & Goodman, F. O.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
10-13
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W1981197306
Cited by
390
References
0
FWCI
75.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tight-binding study of interaction time in molecular switches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.54.10
The paper
English, R. A., Mišković, Z. L., Davison, S. G., & Goodman, F. O. (1996). Tight-binding study of interaction time in molecular switches. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.54.10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.