Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infrared intensities and Raman-scattering activities within density-functional theory

Porezag, Dirk, Pederson, Mark R.·1996·Physical Review B

Abstract

We show that the computational complexity associated with the density-functional-based determination of infrared intensities and nonresonant Raman scattering activities is the same as that required for vibrational modes. Further, we use extremely large basis sets to determine the intrinsic accuracy for calculating such phenomena within the density-functional theory. We present benchmark calculations on ${\mathrm{CH}}_{4}$, ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$O, ${\mathrm{C}}_{2}$${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$, ${\mathrm{C}}_{2}$${\mathrm{H}}_{4}$, and ${\mathrm{C}}_{2}$${\mathrm{H}}_{6}$ within both the local-density approximation (LDA) and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA). Tests of the reliability and numerical stability of the theoretical scheme are presented. We show that in order to obtain reliable results, appropriate polarization basis functions and well-converged wave functions are necessary. While most of the Raman spectra predicted by LDA agree very well with experimental data, some of the infrared intensities show substantial errors. The GGA functional overcomes most of these deficiencies, leading to an overall good agreement with experiment. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.54.7830

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Porezag, D., & Pederson, M. R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1996-09-15
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
7830-7836
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2054765464
Cited by
733
References
1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.