Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Application of Green’s-function technique to the calculation of multiphoton absorption coefficients of crystalline solids

Duan, Chun-gang, Gu, Zong-quan, Li, Jun, Wang, Ding-sheng, Ren, Shang-Fen·1998·Physical Review B

Abstract

The Green's-function method is introduced to avoid the sums over intermediate states occurring in the calculation of multiphoton absorption coefficients of crystalline solids. Up to four-photon absorption coefficients of NaCl are obtained by this method. The results are in accord with those obtained by carrying out the summations directly. The advantages of the method and its further applications are also discussed in the paper.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.57.10

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Duan, C.-G., Gu, Z.-Q., Li, J., Wang, D.-S., & Ren, S.-F.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
10-13
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2095583512
Cited by
375
References
8
FWCI
42.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.