Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pseudopotential study of binding properties of solids within generalized gradient approximations: The role of core-valence exchange correlation

Open access
Fuchs, M., Bockstedte, M., Pehlke, E., Scheffler, M.·1998·Physical Review B

Abstract

In ab initio pseudopotential calculations within density-functional theory, the nonlinear exchange-correlation interaction between valence and core electrons is often treated linearly through the pseudopotential. We discuss the accuracy and limitations of this approximation regarding a comparison of the local-density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximations (GGA's), which we find to describe core-valence exchange-correlation markedly different. (1) Evaluating the binding properties of a number of typical solids, we demonstrate that the pseudopotential approach and the linearization of core-valence exchange correlation are both accurate and limited in the same way in the GGA as in the LDA. (2) Examining the practice to carry out GGA calculations using pseudopotentials derived within the LDA, we show that the ensuing results differ significantly from those obtained using pseudopotentials derived within the GGA. As principal source of these differences we identify the distinct behavior of core-valence exchange correlation in the LDA and GGA which, accordingly, contributes substantially to the GGA-induced changes of calculated binding properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.57.2134

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Fuchs, M., Bockstedte, M., Pehlke, E., & Scheffler, M.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1998-01-15
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
2134-2145
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W1968466890
Cited by
213
References
2
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.