Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,407

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor

Zhang, S. B., Wei, Su-Huai, Zunger, Alex, Katayama-Yoshida, H.·1998·Physical Review B

Abstract

We studied the defect physics in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2},$ a prototype chalcopyrite semiconductor. We showed that (i) it takes much less energy to form a Cu vacancy in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}$ than to form cation vacancies in II-VI compounds (ii) defect formation energies vary considerably both with the Fermi energy and with the chemical potential of the atomic species, and (iii) the defect pairs such as $({2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ and $({2\mathrm{C}\mathrm{u}}_{\mathrm{In}}^{2\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ have particularly low formation energies (under certain conditions, even exothermic). Using (i)--(iii), we (a) explain the existence of unusual ordered compounds ${\mathrm{CuIn}}_{5}{\mathrm{Se}}_{8},$ ${\mathrm{CuIn}}_{3}{\mathrm{Se}}_{5},$ ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{2}{\mathrm{In}}_{4}{\mathrm{Se}}_{7},$ and ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{In}}_{5}{\mathrm{Se}}_{9}$ as a repeat of a single unit of $({2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ pairs for each $n=4,$ 5, 7, and 9 units, respectively, of ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2};$ (b) attribute the very efficient $p$-type self-doping ability of ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}$ to the exceptionally low formation energy of the shallow defect Cu vacancies; (c) explained in terms of an electronic passivation of the ${\mathrm{In}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+}$ by ${2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ the electrically benign character of the large defect population in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}.$ Our calculation leads to a set of new assignment of the observed defect transition energy levels in the band gap. The calculated level positions agree rather well with available experimental data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.57.9642

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,407

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S. B., Wei, S.-H., Zunger, A., & Katayama-Yoshida, H.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
1998-04-15
Volume
57
Issue
16
Pages
9642-9656
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2065164939
Cited by
1,407
References
1
FWCI
27.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.57.9642
The paper
Zhang, S. B., Wei, S.-H., Zunger, A., & Katayama-Yoshida, H. (1998). Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.57.9642

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.