The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor
Abstract
We studied the defect physics in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2},$ a prototype chalcopyrite semiconductor. We showed that (i) it takes much less energy to form a Cu vacancy in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}$ than to form cation vacancies in II-VI compounds (ii) defect formation energies vary considerably both with the Fermi energy and with the chemical potential of the atomic species, and (iii) the defect pairs such as $({2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ and $({2\mathrm{C}\mathrm{u}}_{\mathrm{In}}^{2\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ have particularly low formation energies (under certain conditions, even exothermic). Using (i)--(iii), we (a) explain the existence of unusual ordered compounds ${\mathrm{CuIn}}_{5}{\mathrm{Se}}_{8},$ ${\mathrm{CuIn}}_{3}{\mathrm{Se}}_{5},$ ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{2}{\mathrm{In}}_{4}{\mathrm{Se}}_{7},$ and ${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}{\mathrm{In}}_{5}{\mathrm{Se}}_{9}$ as a repeat of a single unit of $({2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}{+\mathrm{I}\mathrm{n}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+})$ pairs for each $n=4,$ 5, 7, and 9 units, respectively, of ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2};$ (b) attribute the very efficient $p$-type self-doping ability of ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}$ to the exceptionally low formation energy of the shallow defect Cu vacancies; (c) explained in terms of an electronic passivation of the ${\mathrm{In}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{2+}$ by ${2\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{Cu}}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}}$ the electrically benign character of the large defect population in ${\mathrm{CuInSe}}_{2}.$ Our calculation leads to a set of new assignment of the observed defect transition energy levels in the band gap. The calculated level positions agree rather well with available experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Self-citation
Cited by
Wide Band Gap Chalcogenide Semiconductors
Woods-Robinson, R., Han, Y., Zhang, H., Ablekim, T., Khan, I., Persson, K. A., & Zakutayev, A. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00600 · Cited by 513
Effects of organic cations on the defect physics of tin halide perovskites
Shi, T., Zhang, H.-S., Meng, W., Teng, Q., Liu, M., Yang, X., Yan, Y., Yip, H.-L., & Zhao, Y.-J. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta02662e · Cited by 292
Optoelectronic Properties of CuInS2 Nanocrystals and Their Origin
Leach, A. D. P., & Macdonald, J. E. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02211 · Cited by 266
Which one is more favorable in halide perovskites, A-site migration or X-site?
Cai, B., Liu, Y., Yang, B., Hong, H., Chang, K.-W., Kong, M., Ma, Y., Wang, Z., Cao, K., Shen, W., et al. (2025) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/5.0256265 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S. B., Wei, S.-H., Zunger, A., & Katayama-Yoshida, H.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-04-15
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 9642-9656
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2065164939
- Cited by
- 1,407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.57.9642
- The paper
- Zhang, S. B., Wei, S.-H., Zunger, A., & Katayama-Yoshida, H. (1998). Defect physics of theCuInSe2chalcopyrite semiconductor. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.57.9642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.