The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-livedMn2+emission in nanocrystallineZnS:Mn2+
Abstract
Recently, it has been reported that doped semiconductor nanoparticles can yield both high luminescence efficiencies and a spectacular lifetime shortening, which suggests that doped semiconductor nanoparticles form a new class of luminescent materials for various applications. From lifetime measurements and time-resolved spectroscopy we conclude that the ${\mathrm{Mn}}^{2+}$ emission does not show a spectacular shortening of the decay time upon decreasing particle size as reported earlier. The luminescence of nanocrystalline ${\mathrm{Z}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{S}:\mathrm{M}\mathrm{n}}^{2+}$ indeed has a short decay time (\ensuremath{\sim}100 ns), but also shows a long ms range decay time. The short decay time is ascribed to a defect-related emission of ZnS, and is not from the decay of the ${}^{4}{\mathrm{T}}_{1}{\ensuremath{-}}^{6}{\mathrm{A}}_{1}$ transition of the ${\mathrm{Mn}}^{2+}$ impurity as suggested by other authors. The ${}^{4}{\mathrm{T}}_{1}{\ensuremath{-}}^{6}{\mathrm{A}}_{1}$ transition of the ${\mathrm{Mn}}^{2+}$ has a ``normal'' decay of about 1.9 ms. Based on our observations, we conclude that doped semiconductor nanoparticles do not form a new class of luminescent materials, combining a high efficiency with a short (ns) decay time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum Dots and Their Multimodal Applications: A Review
Bera, D., Qian, L., Tseng, T.-K., & Holloway, P. H. (2010) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma3042260 · Cited by 1,365
Maxwell, T., Nogueira Campos, M. G., Smith, S., Doomra, M., Thwin, Z., & Santra, S. (2020) · Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816662-8.00015-1 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Bol, A. A., & Meijerink, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-12-15
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- R15997-R16000
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2324575720
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.