The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations
Abstract
We demonstrate an approach to the development of many-body interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals with improved accuracy and reliability. The functional form of the potentials is that of the embedded-atom method, but the interesting features are as follows: (1) The database used for the development of a potential includes both experimental data and a large set of energies of different alternative crystalline structures of the material generated by ab initio calculations. We introduce a rescaling of interatomic distances in an attempt to improve the compatibility between experimental and ab initio data. (2) The optimum parametrization of the potential for the given database is obtained by alternating the fitting and testing steps. The testing step includes a comparison between the ab initio structural energies and those predicted by the potential. This strategy allows us to achieve the best accuracy of fitting within the intrinsic limitations of the potential model. Using this approach we develop reliable interatomic potentials for Al and Ni. The potentials accurately reproduce basic equilibrium properties of these metals, the elastic constants, the phonon-dispersion curves, the vacancy formation and migration energies, the stacking fault energies, and the surface energies. They also predict the right relative stability of different alternative structures with coordination numbers ranging from 12 to 4. The potentials are expected to be easily transferable to different local environments encountered in atomistic simulations of lattice defects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Cited by
Atomic-level structure and structure–property relationship in metallic glasses
Cheng, Y. Q., & Ma, E. (2011) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.002 · Cited by 1,771
Wu, C., & Zhigilei, L. V. (2014) · Applied Physics A · doi:10.1007/s00339-013-8086-4 · Cited by 367
Embedded-atom potential forB2−NiAl
Mishin, Y., Mehl, M. J., & Papaconstantopoulos, D. A. (2002) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.224114 · Cited by 309
Self-citationZhakhovskii, V. V., Inogamov, N. A., Petrov, Y. V., Ashitkov, S. I., & Nishihara, K. (2009) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.04.082 · Cited by 255
Bayesian ensemble approach to error estimation of interatomic potentials.
Frederiksen, S. L., Jacobsen, K. W., Brown, K. S., & Sethna, J. P. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.165501 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishin, Y., Farkas, D., Mehl, M. J., & Papaconstantopoulos, D. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3393-3407
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2038177296
- Cited by
- 1,526
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.59.3393
- The paper
- Mishin, Y., Farkas, D., Mehl, M. J., & Papaconstantopoulos, D. A. (1999). Interatomic potentials for monoatomic metals from experimental data and ab initio calculations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.3393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.