The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atomic-scale magnetic modeling of oxide nanoparticles
Abstract
We present a method for atomic-scale modeling of the magnetic behavior of ionic magnetic solids. Spin distributions and net magnetic moments are calculated for nanoparticles of ferrimagnetic ${\mathrm{NiFe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{4}$ and $\ensuremath{\gamma}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3},$ and antiferromagnetic NiO as a function of applied field. Calculations incorporate crystal structures and exchange parameters determined from bulk data, bulk anisotropy for core spins, reasonable estimates for the anisotropy of surface spins, and finite temperatures simulated by random perturbations of spins. Surface spin disorder was found in the case of ferrimagnetic spinel nanoparticles, due to broken exchange bonds at the surface. The calculations also demonstrate that surface anisotropy enhances the coercivity of such particles only when surface spin disorder is present. Simulated thermal perturbations were used to characterize the distribution of energy barriers between surface spin states of such particles. The distribution of barriers can explain the macroscopic quantum tunneling like magnetic relaxation at low temperatures found experimentally. Calculations on NiO nanoparticles predict eight, six, or four-sublattice spin configurations in contrast to the two-sublattice configuration accepted for bulk NiO. Relatively weak coupling between the multiple sublattices allows a variety of reversal paths for the spins upon cycling the applied field, resulting in large coercivities and loop shifts, in qualitative agreement with experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Cited by
Exchange bias in nanostructures
Nogués, J., Sort, J., Langlais, V., Skumryev, V., Suriñach, S., Muñoz, J. S., & Baró, M. D. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,925
Moriarty, P. (2001) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/64/3/201 · Cited by 785
Finite size effects on the structural and magnetic properties of sol–gel synthesized NiFe2O4 powders
George, M., Mary John, A., Nair, S. S., Joy, P. A., & Anantharaman, M. R. (2006) · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.08.029 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Kodama, R. H., & Berkowitz, A. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 6321-6336
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2071598970
- Cited by
- 679
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic-scale magnetic modeling of oxide nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.59.6321
- The paper
- Kodama, R. H., & Berkowitz, A. E. (1999). Atomic-scale magnetic modeling of oxide nanoparticles. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.6321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.