The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analytic bond-order potentials beyond Tersoff-Brenner. I. Theory
Abstract
Analytic bond-order potentials (BOP's) are derived for the $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ and $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bond orders by approximating the many-atom expansion for the bond order within the two-center, orthogonal tight-binding (TB) model. The analytic expression, BOP4, is obtained by retaining terms to four levels in the continued fractions for the appropriate Green's functions and describes the $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ bonds in the dimer ${\mathrm{C}}_{2},$ the tetrahedral methane molecule ${\mathrm{CH}}_{4}$ and the trigonal methyl radical ${\mathrm{CH}}_{3}$ exactly. A simplified, but accurate, variant, BOP4S, depends only on the two recursion coefficients ${b}_{1}$ and ${b}_{2}$ that characterize the root-mean-square width and the unimodal versus bimodal shape of the $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ bond eigenspectrum, respectively. An analytic expression for the $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bond order, BOP2M, is obtained by performing matrix recursion to two levels, thereby ensuring that the expression is independent of the choice of coordinate axes, depending only on neighboring bond integrals, bond angles and dihedral angles. A simple analytic expression for the promotion energy is also presented. Advantages of these BOP's over the empirical Tersoff-Brenner potentials are, first, their analytic form is predicted by the theory, second, the $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ bond order expression BOP4S includes the very important shape parameter ${(b}_{2}{/b}_{1}{)}^{2},$ and third, the $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bond order expression BOP2M describes the breaking of saturated $\ensuremath{\pi}$ bonds both on radical formation and under torsion. The following paper examines the accuracy of these BOP's for modeling the energetics of diamond, graphite, and hydrocarbon molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature of the Chemical Bond. V
Pauling, L., & Wheland, G. W. (1934) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1749514 · Cited by 251
Cited by
Thompson, A. P., Aktulga, H. M., Berger, R., Bolintineanu, D. S., Brown, W. M., Crozier, P. S., in 't Veld, P. J., Kohlmeyer, A., Moore, S. G., Nguyen, T. D., et al. (2022) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 · Cited by 12,598
Highly optimized embedded-atom-method potentials for fourteen fcc metals
Sheng, H. W., Kramer, M. J., Cadien, A., Fujita, T., & Chen, M. W. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.134118 · Cited by 532
Computational aspects of many-body potentials
Plimpton, S. J., & Thompson, A. P. (2012) · MRS Bulletin · doi:10.1557/mrs.2012.96 · Cited by 353
Generalizing the environment-dependent interaction potential for carbon
Marks, N. A. (2000) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.035401 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Pettifor, D. G., & Oleinik, I. I.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 8487-8499
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2085688023
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.