The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linear-scaling density-functional theory with Gaussian orbitals and periodic boundary conditions: Efficient evaluation of energy and forces via the fast multipole method
Abstract
We report methodological and computational details of our Kohn-Sham density-functional method with Gaussian orbitals for systems with periodic boundary conditions. Our approach for the Coulomb problem is based on the direct space fast multipole method, which achieves not only linear scaling of computational time with system size but also very high accuracy in all infinite summations. The latter is pivotal for avoiding numerical instabilities that have previously plagued calculations with large bases, especially those containing diffuse functions. Our program also makes extensive use of other linear-scaling techniques recently developed for large clusters. Using these theoretical tools, we have implemented computational programs for energy and analytic energy gradients (forces) that make it possible to optimize geometries of periodic systems with great efficiency and accuracy. Vibrational frequencies are then accurately obtained from finite differences of forces. We demonstrate the capabilities of our methods with benchmark calculations on polyacetylene, polyphenylenevinylene, and a (5,0) carbon nanotube, employing basis sets of double zeta plus polarization quality, in conjunction with the generalized gradient approximation and kinetic-energy density-dependent functionals. The largest calculation reported in this paper contains 244 atoms and 1344 contracted Gaussians in the unit cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E., & Ernzerhof, M. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1564060 · Cited by 19,629
Self-citationRole of Defects in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Chemical Sensors
Robinson, J. A., Snow, E. S., Bǎdescu, Ş. C., Reinecke, T. L., & Perkins, F. K. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl0612289 · Cited by 455
Hybrid Density-Functional Theory and the Insulating Gap ofUO2
Kudin, K. N., Scuseria, G. E., & Martin, R. L. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.266402 · Cited by 342
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kudin, K. N., & Scuseria, G. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-06-15
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 16440-16453
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2062931829
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear-scaling density-functional theory with Gaussian orbitals and periodic boundary conditions: Efficient evaluation of energy and forces via the fast multipole method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.61.16440
- The paper
- Kudin, K. N., & Scuseria, G. E. (2000). Linear-scaling density-functional theory with Gaussian orbitals and periodic boundary conditions: Efficient evaluation of energy and forces via the fast multipole method. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.61.16440
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.