The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic properties of hematite nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
The magnetic properties of hematite $(\ensuremath{\alpha}\ensuremath{-}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ particles with sizes of about 16 nm have been studied by use of M\"ossbauer spectroscopy, magnetization measurements, and neutron diffraction. The nanoparticles are weakly ferromagnetic at temperatures at least down to 5 K with a spontaneous magnetization that is only slightly higher than that of weakly ferromagnetic bulk hematite. At $T\ensuremath{\gtrsim}100\mathrm{K}$ the M\"ossbauer spectra contain a doublet, which is asymmetric due to magnetic relaxation in the presence of an electric field gradient in accordance with the Blume-Tjon model. Simultaneous fitting of series of M\"ossbauer spectra obtained at temperatures from 5 K to well above the superparamagnetic blocking temperature allowed the estimation of the pre-exponential factor in N\'eel's expression for the superparamagnetic relaxation time, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{0}=(6\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}\mathrm{s}$ and the magnetic anisotropy energy barrier, ${E}_{\mathrm{bm}}{/k=590}_{\ensuremath{-}120}^{+150}\mathrm{K}.$ A lower value of the pre-exponential factor, ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{0}{=1.8}_{\ensuremath{-}1.3}^{+3.2}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}\mathrm{s},$ and a significantly lower anisotropy energy barrier ${E}_{\mathrm{bm}}^{\mathrm{magn}}/k=305\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}20\mathrm{K}$ was derived from simultaneous fitting to ac and dc magnetization curves. The difference in the observed energy barriers can be explained by the presence of two different modes of superparamagnetic relaxation which are characteristic of the weakly ferromagnetic phase. One mode involves a rotation of the sublattice magnetization directions in the basal (111) plane, which gives rise to superparamagnetic behavior in both M\"ossbauer spectroscopy and magnetization measurements. The other mode involves a fluctuation of the net magnetization direction out of the basal plane, which mainly affects the magnetization measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermal Fluctuations of a Single-Domain Particle
Brown, W. F. (1963) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.1677 · Cited by 3,374
Cited by
Amorphous Iron(III) OxideA Review
Machala, L., Zboril, R., & Gedanken, A. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp064992s · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Bødker, F., Hansen, M. F., Koch, C. B., Lefmann, K., & Mørup, S.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 6826-6838
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2028691094
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic properties of hematite nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.61.6826
- The paper
- Bødker, F., Hansen, M. F., Koch, C. B., Lefmann, K., & Mørup, S. (2000). Magnetic properties of hematite nanoparticles. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.61.6826
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.