Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trap-limited recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline metal oxide electrodes

Nelson, Jenny, Haque, Saif A., Klug, David R., Durrant, James R.·2001·Physical Review B

Abstract

We use transient and steady-state optical spectroscopies to study the recombination reaction between electrons and dye cations in a dye-sensitized nanocrystalline ${\mathrm{TiO}}_{2}$ electrode in several different chemical environments. Kinetic decay curves are approximately stretched exponential, and the cation half-life, ${t}_{50%}$ varies with electron density n as ${t}_{50%}\ensuremath{\propto}{n}^{\ensuremath{-}1/\ensuremath{\alpha}},$ where \ensuremath{\alpha} is a constant in the range 0.2--0.5. We have developed a model of electron transport in the presence of an energetic distribution of trap states and consider two regimes. In the first, the continuous-time random-walk (CTRW) electrons are free to diffuse through the lattice, by means of multiple trapping events mediated by the conduction band. In the second, the hopping regime, trapped electrons are allowed to tunnel to other, vacant trap sites, or to the dye cation, according to a Miller-Abrahams model for the transition rate. We carry out Monte Carlo simulations of the recombination kinetics as a function of electron density, trap state distributions and other parameters. The CTRW reproduces both the dependence of ${t}_{50%}$ on n and the shape of the kinetic curves with only one free fitting parameter, for the case of an exponential density of trap states. The hopping model is ruled out by subnanosecond measurements. We conclude that multiple trapping with a broad energetic distribution of electron traps is responsible for the slow recombination kinetics. When applied to recombination in a nanocrystalline photovoltaic junction at open circuit, the model predicts a sublinear power-law variation of electron density with light intensity G, $n\ensuremath{\propto}{G}^{\ensuremath{\alpha}},$ compatible with the observed behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.63.205321

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Nelson, J., Haque, S. A., Klug, D. R., & Durrant, J. R.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2001-05-03
Volume
63
Issue
20
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W1997336463
Cited by
397
References
1
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trap-limited recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline metal oxide electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.63.205321
The paper
Nelson, J., Haque, S. A., Klug, D. R., & Durrant, J. R. (2001). Trap-limited recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline metal oxide electrodes. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.63.205321

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.