The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous weak measurement of quantum coherent oscillations
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of continuous quantum measurement of coherent oscillations between two quantum states of an individual two-state system. It is shown that the interplay between the information acquisition and the backaction dephasing of the oscillations by the detector imposes a fundamental limit, equal to four, on the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement. The limit is universal, e.g., independent of the coupling strength between the detector and system, and results from the tendency of quantum measurement to localize the system in one of the measured eigenstates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Implementing Qubits with Superconducting Integrated Circuits
devoret, M. H., & Martinis, J. M. (2004) · Quantum Information Processing · doi:10.1007/s11128-004-3101-5 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Korotkov, A. N., & Averin, D. V.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-10-05
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2048209806
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous weak measurement of quantum coherent oscillations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.64.165310
- The paper
- Korotkov, A. N., & Averin, D. V. (2001). Continuous weak measurement of quantum coherent oscillations. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.64.165310
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
