Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ideal strength of diamond, Si, and Ge

Roundy, David, Cohen, Marvin L.·2001·Physical Review B

Abstract

We have calculated the ideal shear strength and ideal tensile strength of C, Si, and Ge in the diamond structure. We find ideal shear strengths of 95 GPa, 6.5 GPa, and 4.5 GPa, and ideal tensile strengths of 95 GPa, 23 GPa, and 14 GPa for C, Si and Ge respectively. The shear calculation is performed on the ${111}$ slip plane sheared in a $〈112〉$ direction, and the tensile load is applied in the $〈111〉$ direction. We allowed for a full relaxation of the strains orthogonal to the applied strain as well as the atomic basis vectors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.64.212103

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Roundy, D., & Cohen, M. L.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2001-11-12
Volume
64
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2073789527
Cited by
326
References
8
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideal strength of diamond, Si, and Ge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.64.212103
The paper
Roundy, D., & Cohen, M. L. (2001). Ideal strength of diamond, Si, and Ge. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.64.212103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.