Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doping-dependent evolution of the electronic structure ofLa2−xSrxCuO4in the superconducting and metallic phases

Open access
Ino, A., Kim, C., Nakamura, M., Yoshida, T., Mizokawa, T., Fujimori, A., Shen, Z.-X., Kakeshita, T., Eisaki, H., Uchida, S.·2002·Physical Review B

Abstract

The electronic structure of the ${\mathrm{La}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Sr}}_{x}{\mathrm{CuO}}_{4}$ (LSCO) system has been studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). We report on the evolution of the Fermi surface, the superconducting gap, and the band dispersion around the extended saddle point $\mathbf{k}=(\ensuremath{\pi},0)$ with hole doping in the superconducting and metallic phases. As hole concentration x decreases, the flat band at $(\ensuremath{\pi},0)$ moves from above the Fermi level ${(E}_{\mathrm{F}})$ for $x>0.2$ to below ${E}_{\mathrm{F}}$ for $x<0.2,$ and is further lowered down to $x=0.05.$ From the leading-edge shift of ARPES spectra, the magnitude of the superconducting gap around $(\ensuremath{\pi},0)$ is found to monotonically increase as x decreases from $x=0.30$ down to $x=0.05$ even though ${T}_{c}$ decreases in the underdoped region, and the superconducting gap appears to smoothly evolve into the normal-state gap at $x=0.05.$ It is shown that the energy scales characterizing these low-energy structures have similar doping dependences. For the heavily overdoped sample $(x=0.30),$ the band dispersion and the ARPES spectral line shape are analyzed using a simple phenomenological self-energy form, and the electronic effective mass enhancement factor ${m}^{*}{/m}_{b}\ensuremath{\simeq}2$ has been found. As the hole concentration decreases, an incoherent component that cannot be described within the simple self-energy analysis grows intense in the high-energy tail of the ARPES peak. Some unusual features of the electronic structure observed for the underdoped region $(x\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.10)$ are consistent with numerical works on the stripe model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.65.094504

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Ino, A., Kim, C., Nakamura, M., Yoshida, T., Mizokawa, T., Fujimori, A., Shen, Z.-X., Kakeshita, T., Eisaki, H., & Uchida, S.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
65
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W1997170818
Cited by
306
References
43
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doping-dependent evolution of the electronic structure ofLa2−xSrxCuO4in the superconducting and metallic phases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.65.094504
The paper
Ino, A., Kim, C., Nakamura, M., Yoshida, T., Mizokawa, T., Fujimori, A., Shen, Z.-X., Kakeshita, T., Eisaki, H., & Uchida, S. (2002). Doping-dependent evolution of the electronic structure ofLa2−xSrxCuO4in the superconducting and metallic phases. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.65.094504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.