Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular dynamics study of structural properties of amorphousAl2O3

Open access
Gutiérrez, Gonzalo, Johansson, Börje·2002·Physical Review B

Abstract

The structural properties of amorphous aluminum oxide $({\mathrm{Al}}_{2}{\mathrm{O}}_{3})$ have been investigated by means of the molecular dynamics technique. The simulations were done in a microcanonical ensemble, using a pairwise potential, on systems with up to 1800 particles. Three different systems, at densities ranging from 3.0 to $3.3 {\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{c}\mathrm{m}}^{3},$ were prepared by quenching from the melt. The network topology of our system is analyzed through partial pair correlations, coordination numbers, angle distributions, and ring statistics. A detailed analysis of the interatomic distances reveals that in the amorphous state there is a short-range order dominated by a slightly distorted $({\mathrm{AlO}}_{4}{)}^{5\ensuremath{-}}$ tetrahedron, in agreement with recent experimental results. This conclusion is supported by the distribution of nearest-neighbor coordination numbers, where more than $75%$ of Al atoms have four O as nearest-neighbors. Ring statistics reveal the presence of two- to fivefold rings, with a peak at the fourfold ring and where the two- and threefold rings are planar. Comparison with available experimental data and earlier calculations shows that the structures of amorphous and liquid alumina are very similar. The amorphous structure also presents close similarities to the surface structure of \ensuremath{\gamma}-alumina at room temperature. Simulations for systems at different densities show that the coordination number of the elementary unit increases as the density increases, suggesting that the tetrahedrally and octahedrally coordinated forms of amorphous alumina found experimentally correspond to different densities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.65.104202

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Gutiérrez, G., & Johansson, B.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2002-02-11
Volume
65
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2042798550
Cited by
347
References
21
FWCI
16.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular dynamics study of structural properties of amorphousAl2O3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.65.104202
The paper
Gutiérrez, G., & Johansson, B. (2002). Molecular dynamics study of structural properties of amorphousAl2O3. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.65.104202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.