Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quasiparticle scattering interference in high-temperature superconductors

Open access
Wang, Qiang-Hua, Lee, Dung-Hai·2003·Physical Review B

Abstract

We propose that the energy-dependent spatial modulation of the local density of states seen by Hoffman et al. [Science 297, 1148 (2002)] is due to the scattering interference of quasiparticles. In this paper we present the general theoretical basis for such an interpretation and lay out the underlying assumptions. As an example, we perform an exact T-matrix calculation for the scattering due to a single impurity. The results of this calculation is used to check the assumptions, and to demonstrate that quasiparticle scattering interference can indeed produce patterns similar to those observed by Hoffman et al.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevb.67.020511

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Q.-H., & Lee, D.-H.
Venue
Physical Review B
Published
2003-01-31
Volume
67
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-3795
OpenAlex
W2132192786
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
15.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quasiparticle scattering interference in high-temperature superconductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.67.020511
The paper
Wang, Q.-H., & Lee, D.-H. (2003). Quasiparticle scattering interference in high-temperature superconductors. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.67.020511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.